<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T-Mobile (Sharp) Sidekick LX Teardown Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phonewreck.com/2009/09/21/t-mobile-sharp-sidekick-lx-teardown-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phonewreck.com/2009/09/21/t-mobile-sharp-sidekick-lx-teardown-analysis/</link>
	<description>Tearing down, breaking up, and ripping open the latest and greatest phones.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:50:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: K'Shanecia</title>
		<link>http://www.phonewreck.com/2009/09/21/t-mobile-sharp-sidekick-lx-teardown-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-7742</link>
		<dc:creator>K'Shanecia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonewreck.com/?p=500#comment-7742</guid>
		<description>I wonder if they sell the magnetic part that is in back of the screen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if they sell the magnetic part that is in back of the screen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kentwooddan</title>
		<link>http://www.phonewreck.com/2009/09/21/t-mobile-sharp-sidekick-lx-teardown-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-7132</link>
		<dc:creator>kentwooddan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonewreck.com/?p=500#comment-7132</guid>
		<description>I agree this phone could have been much better. The look is great and out does the Blackberry. But the Blackberry&#039;s Performance is way beyond what the Sidekick&#039;s is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree this phone could have been much better. The look is great and out does the Blackberry. But the Blackberry&#8217;s Performance is way beyond what the Sidekick&#8217;s is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radman</title>
		<link>http://www.phonewreck.com/2009/09/21/t-mobile-sharp-sidekick-lx-teardown-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-5683</link>
		<dc:creator>radman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonewreck.com/?p=500#comment-5683</guid>
		<description>hiii.
very nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hiii.<br />
very nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darlene</title>
		<link>http://www.phonewreck.com/2009/09/21/t-mobile-sharp-sidekick-lx-teardown-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-5163</link>
		<dc:creator>Darlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonewreck.com/?p=500#comment-5163</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got this phone - it really sucks. Should have held out for a BlackBerry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got this phone &#8211; it really sucks. Should have held out for a BlackBerry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
